Question 1

Q. Does the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts supersede other redaction requirements?

Accepted Answer

A. No. The parties may have obligations pursuant to statutes and protective orders that may apply to a transcript. Compliance with the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts may not be sufficient to comply with those obligations.

Question 2

Q. Does the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts supersede other redaction requirements?

Accepted Answer

A. No. The parties may have obligations pursuant to statutes and protective orders that may apply to a transcript. Compliance with the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts may not be sufficient to comply with those obligations.

Question 3

Q. Does the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts supersede other redaction requirements?

Accepted Answer

A. No. The parties may have obligations pursuant to statutes and protective orders that may apply to a transcript. Compliance with the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts may not be sufficient to comply with those obligations.

Question 4

Q. Does the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts supersede other redaction requirements?

Accepted Answer

A. No. The parties may have obligations pursuant to statutes and protective orders that may apply to a transcript. Compliance with the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts may not be sufficient to comply with those obligations.

United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Q. Does the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts supersede other redaction requirements?

Q. Does the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts supersede other redaction requirements?

Q. Does the Court’s Policy on Electronic Availability of Transcripts supersede other redaction requirements?